![]() TheCoffeeCoder ( talk) 22:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC) I have deleted the information because the article does not meet Wikipedia's policy and guideline. OpenTTD, Freeciv and Bootstrap, they also rely heavily on primary sources yet are left intact. How can you delete them based on your own judgement alone? - TheCoffeeCoder ( talk) 22:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC) After looking at similar pages, e.g. Izno ( talk) 22:06, 29 June 2017 (UTC) I think most of the sources above are reliable, particularly the conference and academic sources. If we cannot produce those sources, then this article does not meet the general notability guideline and should be merged or deleted as a result. TheCoffeeCoder ( talk) 21:47, 29 June 2017 (UTC) I care about whether we have an article weighted appropriately to verifiable, reliable, secondary sources, both policies. If you are querying the factual accuracy or standard of submission, please highlight specific areas that need improving rather than reverting the whole page to a pointless redirection that tells people nothing about the topic. You are not allowing the issue to even be discussed or for other editors to provide their input. There is already a warning at the top about the number of primary sources being high - surely this is sufficient. Source 16, 17, 18: Proof of OS distributionīy deleting the page, you are preventing anyone and everyone improving the article.Source 12, 25: Official announcements made on social media (by verified users).Source 19, 20: Secondary, public conferences. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |